fishpit.com

Hopefully sometime soon.


Love your question btw.

I hope it will NEVER be outlawed. That would be an unacceptable limitation on parents' rights to bring children up in the way they prefer. Circumcision of newborns is a service. It should be done for all male newborns, but the choice is up to the parents. The advantages outweigh any other considerations.

I was circumcised when I was a baby, don't even remember it.
So whats your point.

When people tell their representatives to support MGMbill.org. This bill has been presented to every state by Matthew Hess. It all about equality of the sexes. It simply inserts male, boy alongside female, girl in the current law that protects females from even drawing a drop of blood for ritual circumcision.
Massachusetts has had a hearing and will decide 3/17/10

Or when a circumcised infant in 1996 turns 18 and thus has standing in court to fight for equality. !996 is when the law protected females.

Write to the AAP "Circumcision Task Force" which may be deciding to recommend male circumcision based on 3 flawed African HIV studies.

Never, because only a few would be this obsessed with child penises.

If pain is your big issue I can tell from experience that modern medicine has all sorts of wonderful drugs that deal with pain very effectively

Wow, how many other people are on this cult crusade with you?

Does your group believe that there is a UFO hidden behind Halley's Comet, and next time the comet comes around you will all get beamed up by the UFO and get transported to paradise?

Get help.

I know so many people who had phimosas, my own father included, who had to undergo circumcision later when it WAS painful, and required dangerous full narcosis, that I have to disagree with you.
My wife worked for years as a childcare worker in Germany, and saw so many kids with chronic infections and other foreskin problems she is totally for circumcision, and yes we did get our sons circumcised.
And they're just fine.

I know so many people who had phimosas, my own father included, who had to undergo circumcision later when it WAS painful, and required dangerous full narcosis, that I have to disagree with you.
My wife worked for years as a childcare worker in Germany, and saw so many kids with chronic infections and other foreskin problems she is totally for circumcision, and yes we did get our sons circumcised.
And they're just fine.

You quiz is a total joke! I bet you are uncut and have low self esteem.

If anything with the CDC and AAP going pro RIC it will just increase the numbers in the USA! Perhaps the hispanic will finally get a clue!


I was circumcised at 18 and can assure you being circumcised is far superior to be uncut! There is no loss of sensitivity and it is not mutilation. Circumcision actually improves sexual function. An uncut guy is basically just masturbating inside his partner, while a circumcised guy gives and receives direct pleasure from his partner.

Being circumcised is also much cleaner, I could careless what the antis say, but uncut guys can wash 3x a day and still have an odor. It is also much healthier to be circumcised, uncircumcised males have a 60% higher chance of acquiring HIV and STDs through heterosexual intercourse. It also looks much better, an anteater is not pleasant to the eye!

Being circumcised is so far superior that I had no hesitation to have my 3 boys (5,3,10mo) circumcised, as I know that there is no downside, only a lifetime of benefits.

Connor.....Mohels don't hangout or do circumcisions in churches.....LMAO! Get your BS facts straight......Straight...LMAO!